Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy.
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The present study retrospectively analyzed the data of 213 patients who underwent laparoscopic ureterolithotomy. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the data of 213 patients, in whom we performed conventional laparoscopic ureterolithotomy from April 2006 and January 2015 based on the diagnosis of an upper or middle ureteral stone. Patients with large ureteral stones (>15 mm) or a history of failed shock-wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy were included in the study. Although the retroperitoneal approach was preferred for 170 patients, the transperitoneal approach was used in the remaining 43 patients. RESULTS The mean patient age was 39.3 ± 12.0 years (range, 18-73). The study population was composed of 78 (26.7%) female and 135 (63.3%) male patients. The mean stone size was 19.7 ± 2.5 mm. The mean operative time was 80.9 ± 10.9 minutes, and the mean blood loss was 63.3 ± 12.7 mL. Intraoperative insertion of a double-J catheter was performed in 76 patients. The overall stone-free rate was 99%. No major complication was observed in any patient. However, conversion to open surgery was necessary in 1 patient. CONCLUSION With high success and low complication rates, laparoscopic ureterolithotomy is an effective and reliable method that ensures quick recovery and may be the first treatment option for patients with large, impacted ureteral stones, as well as for those with a history of failed primary treatment.
منابع مشابه
Comparison of Flexible Ureterorenoscopy and Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy Methods for Proximal Ureteric Stones Greater Than 10 mm.
OBJECTIVE To examine the outcomes and to compare the effectiveness of laparoscopic ureterolithotomy and flexible URS in patients with proximal ureteral stones greater than 10 mm in diameter. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 150 patients who were performed laparoscopic ureterolithotomy and flexible URS because of uretral stones in our urology clinic between January 2010 and June 2015, were anal...
متن کاملComparison of laparoscopic and open ureterolithotomy in impacted and very large ureteral stones.
PURPOSE To compare the efficacy of laparoscopic and open ureterolithotomy in patients with ureteral stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients who had undergone open or laparoscopic ureterolithotomy between 2001 and 2013 in our clinic were enrolled in the study.Ureterolithotomy was performed due to the following reasons: failure to position the patient for ureteroscopy, unreachable stone with ure...
متن کاملRetroperitoneal Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy for Proximal Ureteral Calculi in Selected Patients
OBJECTIVES To summarize our experience of retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for ureteral calculi and evaluate the safety and efficiency of this procedure. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of 197 patients with proximal ureteral calculi who accepted retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy from June 2005 to June 2014. RESULTS All procedures were performed success...
متن کاملLaparoscopic Ureterolithotomy: a Simple Device to Retrieve Stones
We report on the use of Perc NCircle atraumatic stone forceps to retrieve stones during laparoscopic ureterolithotomy. We think that it is a safe, simple device and that it has significant advantages over other methods.
متن کاملLaparoscopic Ureterolithotomy for Giant Ureteric Calculus: A Case Report
We present a case of a 21 year old male who presented with symptomatic right upper ureteric calculus measuring 5 cm × 1.5 cm fulfilling the criteria to be named as giant ureteric calculus. Laparoscopic right ureterolithotomy was performed and the giant ureteric calculus was retrieved.
متن کاملEfficacy of retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for the treatment of large proximal ureteric stones and its impact on renal function
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for the management of large proximal ureteric stones and the impact of this treatment on postoperative renal function. METHODS The data of 12 patients (7 men and 5 women; mean age, 68.5 ± 8.9 years) with large pyeloureteral junction (2 cases) and upper ureteral (10 cases) stones (25...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
دوره 20 1 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016